Photo by intrepid reporter Jessica.
This Tuesday, the State Liquor Authority will meet to review the Vida Group's (owners of Mamajuana Café, El Sole, and Maja Sushi) petition to suspend the "500-foot-rule," which prohibits liquor licenses to be issued to restaurants/bars/lounges within 500 feet of one another, for its new restaurant Papacito.
The owners have repeatedly stated that their restaurant is not to blame for the noise, and that any issues that arise from added traffic to the area due to restaurant attractions, should be handled by the police and New York City authorities.
“On Sunday I have 600 people coming in and out, I can’t stop everyone from enjoying their lives as they want to,” Mamajuana restaurant owner was quoted as saying in a Manhattan Times article this June.
The meeting will be held at 11 a.m. at the SLA offices at 317 Lenox Avenue, at 126th Street.
The DINaction group, whose mission is to limit the amount of noise on Dyckman Street and the surrounding area, something they attribute in part to the chain of restauratns operated on that stretch, offers the following advice to those planning to testify against the petition before the SLA.
• Be polite but firm. Politicians and public servants are
burned out by all the static they have been getting lately from emotionally
overwrought, illogical rants at town meetings. But they recognize the threat to
their vested interests posed by educated, articulate, motivated activists in
the community. Use language that shows you will not give up, but keep it civil:
for example, “I would like to express my serious concern about the Vida Group's
upcoming application for what would be a fourth full liquor license for a
restaurant in one, 500-foot stretch of Dyckman Street. As you know, such a
license is an extraordinary request, and should only be granted if there is not
significant community opposition. I strongly oppose the granting of this
license.”
• Hit on the salient talking points:
1) Noise. The Vida Group promotes café seating for each of
its establishments and then opens the doors to the front doors of their
establishments, blasting music all over the community until into the wee hours
of the morning. For the last month, they have cut back on this, likely in a
short-range attempt to quell local outrage so that the present liquor license
may pass. But we are certain that the doors will be flung open again the day
after the new license is granted.
2) Traffic snarls. Double-parking in front of the
establishments currently holding full liquor licenses on the western end of
Dyckman street has been a persistent problem. Such congestion only became a
problem with the introduction of the present saturation of restaurants with
full liquor licenses. The Vida Group claims it has no control over the matter.
This is an argument against the super-saturation of the area with full liquor
licenses: if the problem is beyond control already, it can only be exacerbated
by the addition of a new licensed establishment. At a recent CB 12 meeting, the
Vida Group tried to make the claim that they were working with a local gas
station to ease congestion until it was pointed out to them that the gas
station is operating its parking operations without a license and blatantly
illegally.
Dyckman Street is a major artery used by both the local
fire-house and ambulances in the area. The fact that it is so often blocked by
customers at the establishments that presently hold liquor licenses in the area
already presents a serious hazard. Granting another license will strongly
exacerbate the problem.
3) Poor oversight by Vida Group of customers with alcoholic
drinks. Members of the community frequently observe patrons of the present
Dyckman Street establishments wandering up and down the Dyckman street with
drinks in hand. This is a serious quality of life issue in an area already
heavy laden with narcotics and violations of open containers laws.
4) Patrons who spill out into the area parks after closing
hours. Members of the community are awakened almost every summer night around 4
am, when the party from Dyckman Street moves around the corner to Inwood Hill
Park on Payson Avenue. The establishments serving alcohol on Dyckman will
likely claim that these are not their patrons, but the proximity of the
after-hours party to their establishments and the fact that these parties
spring up just after their closing times, suggests otherwise.
5) Negative effect on variety of businesses. The ease with
with establishments are getting full liquor licenses is depriving local
residents of a diversity of businesses in the area. Because of the enormous
profits enjoyed by establishments with full liquor licenses, local commercial
realtors are now doubling and even, in some cases, tripling rents, driving out
all businesses that lack a full liquor license. The result is that, in a very
short period, this strip of Dyckman Street has lost a dry cleaner, a deli, and
a copy shop, all of which provided useful services, which now are harder to
reach. Our local butcher is also considering closing shop because of the
hyper-inflation spurred by the ease with which establishments get liquor
licenses in our area.
5) Disapproval by Community Board 12. Community Board 12 has
opposed this application on two occasions. CB 12 asked the Vida Group to hold
off on their application until the 34th precinct could weigh in on
the issue. It has chosen, instead, to go full steam ahead, a direct slap in the
fact to CB 12 and to the community.
6) No positive impact on narcotics. The Vida Group has
claimed that their development of the area has made a positive change. But
local residents can easily observe a flourishing narcotics industry along
Dyckman Street, a problem that has not noticeably improved since the area has
been developed. In fact, open use of narcotics on Dyckman Street seems to have
increased, not decreased.
7) Citizen advocacy. We urge the SLA to offer a
counter-weight to the enormous clout that big businesses exert on this process
and to speak on behalf of local residents like us, who struggle to make their
voices heard.
• If the Vida Group makes unsupportable, illogical, and
emotional appeals – as they always have in the past – please offer a rebuttal.
Can't make it to the meeting? You can send a letter voicing your opinion and concerns. I sugegst CCing your local City Council Member (Jackson and Martinez's former office), State Assembly Member and Senator as well.
PLEASE FOLLOW THESE GUIDELINES FOR MAILING:
Any person in opposition to this application wishes to submit written testimony or other evidence in lieu of (or in addition to) oral testimony, that person may do so by delivering the written testimony or other material to the State Liquor Authority no later than 3:00 p.m. on 8/25/2009.
Any material received after that date will not be considered.
A copy of any material sent to the State liquor Authority should be directed to:
HEARING BUREAU-4th FLOOR. 317 LENOX AVENUE, New York, New York 10027
and must also be delivered to the applicant or it's representative on or before 3:00 p.m. on 8/25/2009 at the following address,
YAMIL MARTINEZ 530 W. 136th STREET, APT 22, New York, NY 10031
Recent Comments